The hostile takeover of the global food system

People should definitely be following Christian Westbrook (the iceage farmer) at UNSHADOWED. He’s an excellent systems thinker, and especially good on the issue of food. This particular interview is extremely informative. The goal of the globalist powers that be is to centralise as much power and control over the population as possible, hence they’re seeking to control all the essentials of existence, beginning with food and energy. Essentially what’s planned is a centrally planned corporate takeover of the food supply, with a view to corporate profits above all, with (false) sustainability as the marketing tool.

As far back as the 1960s, UN reports were discussing the need to feed people with factory products rather than with natural food produced on farms, although they acknowledged that people would not like this and would have to be forced. They called for a time when farming would be just a rich man’s hobby. The plans were initiated by Maurice Strong, a representaive of the Rockefellers, who was behind Agenda 21. He envisaged an era of public private partnerships, which merely means corporations having access to the public purse but retaining control behind the scenes. The public sector acts as the junior partner, and the resting place for socialised debt, while the profits are privatised. Strong’s wife, Hannah had a different perspective, seeking some kind of eco-communist reset, but their plans managed to dovetail because both sought total central control at the global level.

The idea was to impose a single diet on the entire planet, regardless of local ecological reality of cultural preferences evolved over centuries, in a one size fits all manner. This diet, designed by a group composed primarily of animal rights activists, was to contain at most very little in the way of animal products of any kind, and also no starchy vegetables. Ideally animal products were to be eliminated entirel, so the nutrient density of the diet would be greatly reduced. The emphasis was to be on whole grains, green vegetables, nuts, fake meat, insects, and legumes, all of which are problematic in large quantities due to phytic acid (chelates micronutrients), phytoestrogens (endocrine disrupters), thyroid suppressants, oxalates, promoters of chronic inflammation, indigestible chitins, protein absorption blockers etc. In addition, grains are now often desicated with glyphosate, which kills gut microflora (and also the soil microbiota that confer soil fertility). Since plants can’t run away, they practice forms of ‘chemical warfare’. Animal products (where unadulterated with chemicals and unnatural feedstocks) are very healthy and indeed necessary for complete nutrition, as proteins and fats are essential nutrients and carbohydrates are not. For instance, vitamin B12, which is essential, is only found in animal products. No attention was paid to the fact that grain production as currently practiced requires huge amounts of fossil fuel energy (for planting, fertilisers, pesticides, harvest, distribution etc) with ten units of energy in for every one unit of food energy produced. This is the antithesis of sustainability.

The Eat Foundation was intended, run by one of Klaus Schwab’s Young Global Leaders from the World Economic Forum (WEF), is supposed to be the Davos for food. The foundation is backed financially by bankers and by all the large agricultural corporations, chemical fertiliser companies, and food processors. In other words, the corporations that have created the current situation with over-processed and chemically adulterated ‘food’ with little nutritional value, are the ones to be in control of the future of food, where they will profit from malnutrition and the much reduced health of the population. They plan to enforce this by first demonising the consumption of natural foodstuffs, and later criminalising traditional food production from farming. It begins by emotionally brainwashing the youth, and encouraging them to criticise the choices of their parents. They will be told that their parents are simply ignorant and didn’t know any better because they didn’t have access to science. They will be made to feel superior, and to look down on any practice not sanctioned by the gatekeepers of ‘truth’. Restaurants are to be encouraged to stop serving meat, and to treat carnivores as socially unacceptable, like smokers. Meat is to be taxed punitively, as smoking currently is, in order to discourage it financially. All nutritional labelling is to reflect the new prevailing orthodoxy, meaning all of it will be inaccurate.

The WEF also promises millions of eyes surveilling people’s choices in order to ensure compliance with ‘climate and sustainability’ priorities. This would be achieved through a financial reset into programmable digital currencies, which would be fully transparent, so privacy would be eliminated. Finance is to have a large role in enforcement, as profitability is ultimately paramount. BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, is already forcing companies to impose ESG guidelines (extreme wokeness) that destroy their brands. Companies can choose to die quickly by having their access to credit withdrawn, or to die slowly as their brands are fatally undermined, as Bud Light recently discovered. The CEO of BlackRock, Larry Fink, is now the head of the WEF, and is on the record saying that BlackRock intends to use their financial leverage to force behavioural change.

Scientific debate is in danger as diversity of opinion is increasingly not tolerated. Journals are already hostage to those who hold the purse strings, so science has already been heavily corrupted by money. In the future that the globalists envisage, there would be uniformity of allowable thought, on food as with most other subjects. As was the case during the covid era, dissidents are to be discredited, censored, and punished.

A major goal is to get people off the land and into 15 minute cities where they can be coralled, and therefore more esasily surveilled and controlled. The land is to be privatised for the use of the super rich, including for the production of biofuels for their use, as a liquid and gaseous fuel crisis looms due to the disruption and destruction of the global fossil fuel industries, combined with rapidly falling energy returned over energy invested (EROEI). This is to be forced by curtailing access to transport fuel, and financially through artificially increased cost of essentials, ever-rising property taxes, increasing cost of insurance, general tax increases, and finally taxes on unrealised capital gains, as has already been imposed in the Netherlands. This means being sent a tax bill based on the increased capital value of assets, including primary residences. As the gain is unrealised until the property is sold, the income to pay the tax bill likely does not exist, meaning the asset must then be sold in order to pay the tax bill. The WEF slogan is “You will own nothing and you will be happy”, and this is how they intend to achieve that. If they succeed in getting farmers off their land, it would be very difficult to restore a resilient system.

Grassroots resistence against this assault on the food system, and many other aspects of life, is essential. Attempts at extreme centralisation are ultimately doomed to fail, as they always have, but it’s not yet clear how far the globalists will get with their plans. People must do everything they can to remain independent of the digital gulag system that they’re trying to impose. They will exert extreme pressure, as they did during the covid practice run. Any form of leverage that can be used against people will be used, whether debt or any form of dependence on government. Maintaining independence will be very challenging, but also of critical importance. It will be a question of outlasting them by maintaining independence until they eventually fail, but it will likely be necessary to accept many sacrifices and to live very simply. Living as close to nature as possible, maintianing as direct a connection with the essentials of one’s existence as possible, building community and relationships of trust, planning for collective resilience at the local level, and getting expectations in line with what reality can hope to deliver are necessary accommodations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Verified by MonsterInsights